What is the impact of different models for governing open spatial data on the performance of open spatial data policies in Europe?
Many European countries are setting up initiatives and taking actions to make their data ‘open’, i.e. to make data freely available for use and re-use. The Digital Agenda for Europe, the first of seven flagships initiatives under Europe 2020, encourages governments to stimulate content markets by making public sector information available in a transparent and effective manner. It is hoped that the greater availability of interoperable public data will catalyse the secondary use of such data, leading to the growth of information industries and better government transparency. A large part of governmental data can be considered as spatial data, i.e. data that refer to a location on the earth. Typical examples of spatial data are topographical maps, address data, road data, and hydrographical data. Spatial data are becoming increasingly important in society, as most of the societal, environmental and economic challenges that governments, businesses and citizens are facing, require spatial understanding and
While an important driving force for organizations to open their data comes from the Digital Agenda of the European Commission, together with the Directive on public sector re-use and the Directive establishing an infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE), each country and accordingly each public organization approaches and implements open spatial data in a rather unique way. This especially applies to the governance models being utilized for managing the relationships and dependencies between all involved actors, units and organizations. Due to the lack of research on the governance of open spatial data policies, it still remains difficult to understand the impact of implemented governance models on the performance of open spatial data initiatives. As a result, practitioners and policy makers remain uninformed and uncertain about the success and appropriateness of their open spatial data governance model.
The central research question the E-GOS project aimed to answer is: what is the impact of different models for governing open spatial data on the performance of open spatial data policies in Europe?
To answer this research question, a case study approach is implemented, analyzing two countries that are among the leading open data countries in the world: the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. The project is executed in close collaboration with the Dutch Ministry of the Interior and Kingdom Relations, the public authority responsible for the implementation of the open government agenda in the Netherlands, and the Open Data Institute in the United Kingdom, one of the pioneering bodies in Europe in the field of open data. The expected new insights in the performance of the governance models will allow public administrations to optimize their governance model of open spatial data to further the societal impact of open data policies.
- Vancauwenberghe, G., Valečkaitė, K., van Loenen, B. & Welle Donker, F. (2018). Assessing the Openness of Spatial Data Infrastructures: Towards a Map of Open SDI. International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, 13.
- Vancauwenberghe, G., & van Loenen, B. (2018). SDI Research and Strategies towards 2030: Renewing the SDI Research Agenda: Workshop Report. Delft.
- Vancauwenberghe, G., & van Loenen, B. (2018). Towards a Map of Open SDI/INSPIRE: Workshop Report. Delft.
- Vancauwenberghe, G., & van Loenen B. (2018). Exploring the Emergence of Open Spatial Data Infrastructures: Analysis of Recent Developments and Trends in Europe. In Saeed S., Ramayah T., & Mahmood Z. (Eds.), User Centric E-government. Challenges and opportunities. New York: Springer International Publishing.
- Vancauwenberghe, G. & van Loenen, B. (2017). Governance of open spatial data infrastructures in Europe. In: The Social Dynamics of Open Data. François van Schalkwyk, Stefaan G Verhulst, Gustavo Magalhaes, Juan Pane, Johanna Walker (eds.). African Minds, pp. 63-88.
The E-GOS project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 706999. The publications on this webpage reflect the views only of the author, and the European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.